Data imports
Data imports and scheduled source connections.
Give your team a clear view of financial records and unresolved differences.
Zimozi develops reporting and reconciliation tools for fintech operations. We bring together approved data sources, apply agreed matching rules and help staff investigate records that need attention.
Data imports and scheduled source connections.
Transaction and settlement matching workflows.
Exception queues and investigation screens.
Data imports and scheduled source connections.
Transaction and settlement matching workflows.
Exception queues and investigation screens.
Operational dashboards and scheduled reports.
Review notes, approvals and activity records.
Exports to agreed accounting and reporting formats.
Financial information may arrive from payment providers, internal systems and accounting platforms at different times. We map each source and define how records should be compared.
Reports distinguish confirmed information from missing or unresolved items so staff can act on the right cases.
Data imports and scheduled source connections.
Amounts, currency, dates and calculation rules need explicit definitions. Core totals and matching rules should be deterministic. AI can assist with explanations and case summaries where useful, while the underlying financial records remain controlled.
We agree who uses each report, how often it updates and which actions follow from it. Testing covers source completeness, calculations, access permissions and common reconciliation exceptions.
Understand the users, current process and intended result.
Review the data, systems, access and review needs.
Build a focused pilot around the agreed use case.
Connect the solution to the workflow and test exceptions.
Monitor quality, usage and costs, then improve.

Amounts, currency, dates and calculation rules need explicit definitions. Core totals and matching rules should be deterministic. AI can assist with explanations and case summaries where useful, while the underlying financial records remain controlled.
Deliver the right reporting view
An operations team compares internal transaction records with a provider's settlement file.
The software matches records using agreed identifiers, amounts and dates. It flags missing entries, duplicates and differences for review rather than silently changing them.
This example illustrates a potential workflow, not a claimed customer result.
We agree who uses each report, how often it updates and which actions follow from it.
Testing covers source completeness, calculations, access permissions and common reconciliation exceptions.
Can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Send us a message and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
Send messageYes, when currency handling, exchange rate sources and matching rules are defined in the scope.
No. Some cases require investigation or approval. We define which matches can be accepted automatically and which remain in review.
Yes, where appropriate APIs, exports or database access are available. Source quality and update frequency are assessed first.
Share your current platform, users and delivery priorities. We will help define a practical next step.
Share a short brief, or book a time to talk with our team.